July 26, 2004  

In-season Report Card: Three-Quarters

Once again, it's time to break out the slide rules and do some sabermetric number crunching on the league standings and take a look at the league's under- and over-achievers over the first 120 or so games of the 2004 season.

The Third Quarter

First, let's take a look at who's hot and who's not by isolating the third quarter statistics so we can see how teams have performed since the All-Star Break, roughly games 80 through 120.

The top team continued to be the league-leading Newark Sugar Bears, who were a league-best 25-15 (.625 W%) after the break; they also led the league in runs scored (287) and in run-differential (+76) over the third quarter, despite giving up a 5th-worst 211 runs. In second-place were the Morris Division-leading Arkansas Golden Falcons, who went 23-16 despite scoring just 177 runs (12th), thanks to their league-best 153 RA, for a 4th-best +24 diff. The Falcs were followed by the Stanhope Mighty Men, (23-17, 215 RS, 162 RA, +53 diff), the Carolina Mudcats (23-18, 163 RS, 161 RA, +2 diff) and the Honolulu Sharks (22-19, 204 RS, 173 RA, +31 diff) -- no surprise, as all five teams are in the thick of the playoff race.

But it is surprising to see who ranked as the next four-hottest teams over the third quarter: The Hoboken Cutters (19-19, 179 RS, 193 RA, -14 diff), the Tijuana Banditos (19-20, 211 RS, 210 RA, +1 diff), the Westwood Deductions (19-20, 163 RS, 186 RA, -23 diff) and the Hillsborough Destroyers (20-22, 208 RS, 210 RA, -2 diff). All four had dug themselves into such deep holes before the All-Star Break that their solid third quarters didn't make much of a difference. The Columbia Rattlesnakes, on the other hand, had built up enough of a cushion over the first half of the season (46-38) to survive a fifth-worst 19-23 third quarter (202 RF, 220 RA, -18 diff).

It was business-as-usual for the woeful Philadelphia Endzone Animals (17-21, 204 RS, 215 RA, -11 diff), Harrison Rats (17-21, 198 RS, 235 RA, -37 diff) and Phoenix Dragons (17-24, 204 RS, 255 RA, -51 diff), who all continued to struggle. But none of those cellar-dwelling teams ranked as the league's worst over the third quarter. No, the worst team over the 40-game stretch were the Vancouver Iron Fist, who ended the third quarter in 8th place, a game out of the final playoff spot, after going a league-worst 15-23 (.395 W%). The Iron Fist ranked 11th in runs scored (178) and 7th in runs allowed (209) for a third-worst -31 run differential over the third quarter. Remember, at the All-Star Break, this time had the league's 6th-best record (43-39) and were 3 games ahead of the 7th-place team! On the other hand, maybe the real surprise wasn't how the Iron Fist performed in the third quarter, but how they performed in the first: After going a league-best 26-14 (.650 W%) over the first 40 games of the season, the Fisters went 32-48 (.400) over their next 80 -- which is almost exactly where the pre-season sims predicted they'd be.

Pythagorean Baseball

The Pythagorean Theorem isn't just for triangles. Initially developed by Bill James, it can be used to determine what a team's record "should" be, based on how many runs they score and how many runs they allow. Over the course of a few thousand games, a team's won-loss record will almost always correspond to its Pythagorean Winning Percentage, which is determined by the square of a team's runs for divided by the square of a team's runs against plus the square of runs for: RF^2/(RA^2+RF^2).

However, the smaller sample size of just 120-odd games played means most teams will perform a couple games better or worse than their Pythagorean Winning Percentage. Old-school baseball watchers say the difference between the expected and actual winning percentages can be explained by intangibles like team chemistry, clutch hitting or plain ol' hustle. But the sabermetricians chalk the difference up to luck -- which usually evens out over the course of a long season. In theory, a team that is one or two wins ahead of its Pythagorean Performance over the first quarter can expect to give those games back sometime before the end of the year; the same goes for teams that are "owed" wins.

 Pythagorean Performance
Expected Actual  
2004
RF RA Diff PCT W L PCT W L +/-
Newark
776 602
+174 0.624 76 46
0.631 77 45 +1
Stanhope
710
552
+158 0.623 75
46 0.587 71 50 - 4
Arkansas
646
514
+132
0.612 73 46 0.622 74 45 +1
Carolina
578 511 + 67
0.561 68 54 0.598 73 49 +5
Columbia
577 571
+   6
0.505 64 62 0.516 65 61 +1
Philly
639 642
-   3
0.498 59 60 0.462 55 64 - 4
Tijuana
613 618
-   5
0.496 60 61 0.488 59 62 - 1
Vancouver
601 610
-   9
0.493 59 61 0.483 58 62 - 1
Honolulu
525 538
- 13
0.488 60
62 0.492 60 62 0
Westwood
483 559
- 76
0.427 51 69
0.417 50 70 - 1
Hillsboro
570
669
- 99
0.421 52 71 0.407 50 73 - 2
Phoenix
625 727
-102
0.425 52 71
0.431 53 70 +1
Harrison
587 702
-115
0.411 50 71
0.430 52 69 +2
Hoboken
514 629
-115 0.400 49 74
0.439 54 69 +5

According to the theorem, the unluckiest teams over the third quarter were the Philadelphia Endzone Animals and the Stanhope Mighty Men, who were each four wins worse than their run differential predicted. The Animals have ranked among the league's unluckiest teams at both the quarter-season and half-season milemarkers as well. The Mighty Men were actually a game better than their run-differential after the first 40 games of the season, but have seen a five-game swing over the next 80. Four more wins would jump the 9th-place Animals three spots in the standings and into a playoff berth at one game under .500. If the Mites could have those four wins, they'd jump two spots in the standings and be just one game out of the league's best record... The formula says Hillsborough Destroyers should be 2 games better than their league-worst 50-73 record, which would put them into 13th place; other unlucky teams are the Tijuana Banditos, the Vancouver Iron Fist and the Westwood Deductions, all a rather insignificant 1 game worse than their run-differential.

Two teams played significantly better than theorem expected, including -- for the second straight quarter -- the Hoboken Cutters. The Cutters, a game behind the theorem's prediction for the first quarter, have more than made up for it over the next 80 games of the season. The Cutters are tied for the league's worst run differential (-115), thanks to the league's second-worst offense (514 RF) and fifth-worst defense (629 RA). But they rank 10th with a 54-69 record, 5 games better than the theorem predicts. If they were 49-74, they'd have a one-game lead for the league's worst record. The league's other overachiever were the Carolina Mudcats, who also were 5 games better than the formula. Without those 5 wins, they'd drop from 3rd place to 4th. The 'Cats have been getting the breaks all season, finishing at +1, +2 and +2 over each 40-game chunk of the season so far... The next luckiest team, the Harrison Rats, are 2 wins better than Pythagoras would guess. The Rats, tied with the Cutters with a -115 run differential, would drop from an 11th-place tie into sole possession of 13th place... Four teams were one win ahead of their differential: The Newark Sugar Bears, Arkansas Golden Falcons, Columbia Rattlesnakes and Phoenix Dragons.

The only team to play right where the formula said they would were the Honolulu Sharks.

One Is the Loneliest Number

Don't like looking to the ancient Greeks for baseball analysis? No problem! Another way to look at a team's performance is how they do in one-run games. In addition to his pioneering work in applying the Pythagorean Theorem to predicting a team's winning percentage, Bill James also has another theory that a team's winning percentage in one-run games should roughly correspond to its Pythagorean Winning Percentage -- a team that has a Pythagorean winning percentage of .600 should win about 60 percent of its one-run games. But, of course, it doesn't always work that way. The difference between a team's expected and actual one-run records could be explained by managerial tactics, clutch hitting, tough pitching, a deeper bench or bullpen, a blown call by an umpire... or just dumb luck.

We looked at how many one-run games each team had been in over the first three quarters of the season, then multiplied those games by the team's Pythagorean Winning Percentage to come up with the team's expected performance in one-run games. Then we compared it to their actual performance in those contests. Because a team can't get half a win, we rounded the results to the closest whole number.

1-Run Games
Expected
Actual
 
2004 W
L Pct.
W
L
Pct. +/-
Hoboken
12 19 0.400 20 11 0.645 +8
Columbia
22 22 0.505 25 19 0.568 +3
Carolina
21
16
0.561 21 16 0.568 0
Harrison
10
15
0.411
14 11 0.560 +4
Phoenix
12
17
0.425
16 13 0.552 +4
Honolulu
17
18
0.488
19 16 0.543 +2
Stanhope
17
11
0.623
15 13 0.536 - 2
Newark
22
14
0.624
19 17 0.528 - 3
Tijuana
17
17
0.496
16 18 0.471 - 1
Arkansas
15
10
0.612
11 14 0.440 - 4
Vancouver
16
17
0.493 14 19 0.424 - 2
Westwood
15
20
0.427 14
21 0.400 - 1
Hillsboro
15
20
0.421 14 21 0.400 - 1
Philly
14
15
0.498
10 19 0.345 - 4

Once again, the Hoboken Cutters rank as one of the league's luckiest teams. The Cutters have the DMBL's third-worst record, but they have the league's best record in one-run games -- an incredible 20-11 (.645)! That's 8 games better than predicted, twice as many "lucky wins" as any other team. The Harrison Rats and Phoenix Dragons are 4 games better,  followed by the Columbia Rattlesnakes at +3 and the Honolulu Sharks at +2.

The Philadelphia Endzone Animals get screwed again. The formula predicts they should win about half their one-run games, but instead they're a league-worst 10-19 (.345). Actually, the Endzone Animals were even worse (7-15) in one-run games at the All-Star Break, so over the last 40 games or so, they've played truer to their run-differential by going 3-4. The team with the worst record in one-run games over the third quarter of the season were the Arkansas Golden Falcons, who went 3-5 (.375) over that stretch, 11-14 (.440) overall. The Golden Falcons' Pythagorean Winning Percentage suggests they should be more like 15-10 in one-run games, a swing of four games. Other teams that aren't winning the close ones as often as they should are the Newark Sugar Bears (-3), Stanhope Mighty Men (-2) and Vancouver Iron Fist (-2); teams that are one win worse than expected in one-run games are the Tijuana Banditos, Westwood Deductions and Hillsborough Destroyers.

The Carolina Mudcats were the only team in line with their predicted performance in one-run games.

Breaking It Down

Putting the Pythagorean Winning Percentage and One-Run Winning Percentage together, we can determine which teams got the breaks over the first 120 games of the season.

The luckiest team so far this year have been the Hoboken Cutters, who are a whopping 13 games better than their numbers -- with eight "extra" wins in one-run games, and five wins more than predicted by their runs scored/allowed differential. Take away those eight wins and they'd be at 46-77 -- by far, the worst record in baseball. Other overachievers: Harrison Rats (+6), Carolina Mudcats (+5), Phoenix Dragons (+5), Columbia Rattlesnakes (+4), Honolulu Sharks (+2),.

The unluckiest team was the Philadelphia Endzone Animals, who finished the third quarter 8 wins worse than the numbers would suggest, coming up 4 wins short in each the Pythagorean and One-Run formulas. In fact, the Endzone Animals -- currently in 9th place, 9 games under .500 and 3½ games out of 6th place -- should be more like 63-56, with a 1½-game lead over 5th place! Of course, "should be" doesn't count in the standings. The next unluckiest team was the Stanhope Mighty Men (-6), who are four wins worse than their Pythagorean performance and two wins off their expected record in one-run games... The Arkansas Golden Falcons (-3), Hillsborough Destroyers (-3), Vancouver Iron Fist (-3), Newark Sugar Bears (-2), Tijuana Banditos (-2) and Westwood Deductions (-2) also are owed wins by the baseball gods.

In theory, luck evens out over the course of the season. Looking at the numbers, we can expect the "unlucky" teams to play better over the final quarter of the season, and the "lucky" teams to fade a little... at least, in theory.

But who knows? Injuries, free-agent signings, lineup or rotation changes all bring an element of unpredictability into a baseball season -- as do blown calls by umpires, wind-blown pop ups and bad hops over infielders' hitters. These games aren't played on paper, but on the fields of the DMBL. So let's put down our calculators and play ball!

Cecil Fielder was the first selection in the DMBL's inaugural draft in 1991. Since then he's enjoyed a solid career as a member of seven DMBL teams. He is now retired and serves as the color man for the Columbia Rattlesnakes radio team. Click Here for past articles.